Hello Scarborough
/We spent the day in Scarborough. And the weather was kind to us. Of course I had a camera with me.
Rob Miles on the web. Also available in Real Life (tm)
We spent the day in Scarborough. And the weather was kind to us. Of course I had a camera with me.
This is not a video game shop
Went to York today. Of course we took a picture of York Minster (see above). Of course we had a great meal at Zaap Thai. And of course we went to the Sore Thumb retro video game shop. This is an amazing place. Consoles and games jostle together on crammed shelves and they have at least one of everything. The even had a couple of GameBoy micros but not at prices I could ever afford. I made one small, silly purchase (of which more later) and they let me take some pictures of the place.
If you’re in York you really should go. If you’re near York you should go to York and then go there. A great place.
Hornsea Mere
Another purchase that I made last Thursday was of a rather special film developing tank which can develop three films at once.
It contains three spirals into which you wind the films before putting the whole thing in the light tight tank and pouring in the chemicals.
This is a good idea because if you use large format film with only a few shots per roll you find yourself coming home with multiple films to be developed. Also, you can save up a bunch of films and then do them all at once. I was going to put three films in the tank but it occurred to me that this would be a bad idea if the tank was faulty. So I found an old film which had some pictures on it but had been slightly spoiled when I opened the camera back by mistake. I wasn’t expecting there to be much on this film, so if it didn’t work I’d be quite relaxed about it. However, it worked just fine and I even had some pictures turn out OK, which was nice.
I was at Hull University again today so I snapped a bunch of pictures with my new (to me) half frame Russian camera. It is now one of my favourite devices. But not because it works. The drive mechanism for the film is faulty. Some of the pins on the film advance sprockets are worn down a bit, probably by a previous owner rewinding the film without disengaging the drive. A lot can happen to a camera over fifty years. This means that the film doesn’t always wind on properly. So you get one frame overlaid on top of another. And you get pictures like these:
the lens is very sharp and the exposure seems to work fine
No two pictures the same…
Close to working properly…
I had a lot of good times here..
The things you get right are interesting. But sometimes the things that you get wrong are even more interesting. I liked the idea of making images that had two pictures in the frame, but what I’ve ended up with is even more than this. I’ve kind of figured out how to make the film move properly most of the time, but I think every now and then I’ll get this camera out just to see what kind of pictures it creates for me.
I went to the Photography Show last Saturday. I took a film camera, as you do, and I’ve just got the pictures processed.
Dial telephones are cool again!
Wow
Not something you see every day.
I was in Hull University today so I popped a film in my latest camera and took a bunch of pictures. The light was very good and I’m really happy with the results.
A very attentive robot in the lab
The all important emergency stop switch
Campus looking good
Applied Science
Today finds us at the Photography and Video Show in the National Exhibition Centre (NEC). I’ve not been before. It’s awesome. Loads of familiar brands plus a whole bunch of other interesting stuff. My favourite stand was the Disabled Photographers Society. They collect donations over the year and then put them all up for sale at the show. So there were lots of old cameras to root through.
A little dusty but otherwise perfect
I found the Pentax ProgramA you can see above. This dates from around 1980. I’ve no idea if it works. It was one of the first “battery only” cameras and it won’t do anything until you give it a couple of LR44 cells. I’ll find out when I get home whether or not it works.
Next year the show will be in London rather than Birmingham. I’m definitely going to try to get there though, it was great fun.
Update: I got the camera home, popped in a couple of batteries and everything seems to do what it should. So the next step is to pop a film in it.
NOTE THE LOVELY BEVELS on the top of the holder. I’m very proud of those.
We’re heading to the Photography and Video Show today. So I spent the morning 3D printing some prototype Minox film holders. As you do. Each of the five holder is a slightly different height, so that you can pick the one that works the best for your scanner.
Princes Quay
Took a camera for a walk around town today. It was loaded with fast film, so the pictures are a bit more grainy than usual, but I reckon they look pretty good.
Murdoch bridge. No. Not that murdoch
Boat with a very big reading light
Tidal Barrier
This picture was taken in the afternoon
…except sometimes.
This picture is not black and white
Took my latest camera to the Humber Bridge today to see if it works OK. It does.
I really wish I’d not sold that lens…
The replacement power supply for my old hard disk has turned up. And it works a treat. So to celebrate I’m rerunning one my favourite pictures from 2015. And I’m going to make another backup of all the files.
Just in case.
Really must replace that bulb
I’ve bought another camera. It’s ten years old and wonderful. I had to buy a lens to go with it and I happened across the TTArtisan APS-C 25mm F2. You can get this for the frankly silly price of 69.00 pounds.
My standard test shot came out pretty well too
The lens is metal bodied, immaculately presented and has a metal screw-on lens cap for extra class (although it makes it a bit harder to use). It’s manual focus and aperture, so you’ll have to adjust the settings yourself, but the quality of the output is wonderful. You would have to spend a lot of money to better it.
I think this camera works
Ages ago I bought a cheap old camera, just to get the lenses that came with it. Then I put a film in the camera just to see if it would work. It didn’t. The the pictures through the viewfinder looked sharp but the finished prints were full of blur. Now that I’m back into photography (in what seems like a big way) I thought I’d see about replacing the dodgy camera; a Canon 650, with another, less dodgy one. So I did. The replacement cost me ten pounds and came with a smart little case. I took it out for a walk today and shot a bunch of pictures.
Can you guess what time this picture was taken
This camera works a treat. It is fully automatic. It focusses, works out the exposure and even winds the film on after each shot. And it seems to be getting it all right too. I was using a “nifty fifty” (a prime lens with a 50mm focal length) that I happened to have lying around for these shots and they came out lovely and sharp. It allows full manual control too, if you want to make your pictures the hard way.
The whole thing brought home just how cheaply you can get into analogue photography. There is nothing wrong with the Canon 650 except hat it is out of fashion. It is very plasticky and a bit of an ugly lump. But that was the fashion in 1987 when it was released. As a first camera I think it would be hard to beat. You’ll have to find a lens for it (search for “canon ef 50mm”) and you will find that they tend to cost a bit more than the camera. However, you should be able to get started for less than the price of a modern video game. And there is always the chance that if you ask around the family someone might confess to having an old camera like this in the back of a wardrobe somewhere.
I’m certainly going to use my 650 quite a bit. While I quite like the process of working out the exposure and getting the focus right, it is rather nice to have a camera just do all that stuff for you every now and then.
The light was really nice this morning
One of the things about old cameras is that they like a bit of exercise. And, with the weight of some of them they give you a bit of exercise too. Ho ho. (With the increasing use of ChatGPT in these hallowed pages I feel I must make it clear that I personally came up with that line). Anyhoo, I loaded the Pentax 67 up with a roll of film and took it round the block today. The good news is that the camera made all the right clunking noises when I pressed the button. I processed the film and the pictures are all in the right place too which is nice (and not guaranteed with this model of camera). You get an awful lot of detail with a big negative, and the perspective of the lens is really nice.
More of these are coming to our area thanks to the wonders of de-regulation…
Not bad for a 20 year old camera
Took the Lumix DMC-LC5 camera for a walk earlier in the week and I’ve only just got round to getting the pictures out of it. The camera was created by Leica and Panasonic, has an amazing lens and a tiny (by modern standards) sensor. However it is particularly good with some colours, particularly red.
The water levels are quite high at the moment
I must get into the habit of taking these old devices out every now and then. They are quite fun.
The film certainly has that seventies vibe..
Phoenix film is quite something. It’s an entirely new colour film launched by Harman Labs, who also make Ilford films. I got myself a roll of it for Christmas. I loaded the roll into my newest old camera, the venerable Pentax ME Super and we headed off for York. It’s sold as an experimental colour film. It’s an experimental film all right.
My biggest problem turned out to be that Phoenix film likes plenty of light. But the Pentax ME quite likes to under expose a little for moody dark shots. So I ended up with a whole bunch of muddy underexposed pictures that were lacking in much colour. The picture above was of a vibrant shop front full of colourful cakes. The sharpness is fine and the shot is not without merit, but the above was only achieved after considerable tweakage to bring up the light levels.
I’m going to have another go with it later (assuming I can get my hands on another roll). And when I do I’ll expose it at around half its speed. And I’ll make sure that I’ve got something very big and colourful right in the middle of the frame.
I could show you the inside where the film is stored, but it wouldn’t end well
The device above is called a “bulk loader”. The big round bit at the back is where you put a big spool of film (best to do this in the dark). You then close off the film storage area and open the light-tight hatch to load an empty 35mm cassette. Then you close the hatch and wind 24 shots of hopefully unexposed film into the cassette.
It’s a way of recycling old film cassettes and saving money on film, as film in bulk is a bit cheaper to buy. I’ll let you know whether or not it works when I’ve run a film through the camera and developed it….
I did say “don’t move” as I took the picture. Not everybody heard me.
With family members heading home I thought I’d get out the pictures that I took with the 3D printed camera at the Rather Useful Seminar I did in November and do some Boxing Day development. One picture seems to have suffered with a light leak (I need to be very careful not to pull the film holder away from the camera when the dark slide isn’t in place). But the other is quite good. At least the people there will be able to recognise themselves.
Should really have cleared up the marks on the negative
Today I developed the first film from my “super cheap broken Pentax”. The pictures game out great, including some of the family.
The camera even managed to pull some detail out of the foreground
If you are thinking of doing some film photography you could do a lot worse than pick up a cheap old Pentax like the ME super and run a film through it. These things were made a long time ago, but they are pretty hard to break. Some film SLRs (for example the Pentax K1000) sell for silly high prices, but you can pick up a Pentax ME Super for less than the price of a video game. Not because it is a particularly bad camera, but because it is less fashionable to be seen with. You get automatic exposure and a nice pocketable form factor. And if it breaks you can sell the bits.
Rob Miles is technology author and educator who spent many years as a lecturer in Computer Science at the University of Hull. He is also a Microsoft Developer Technologies MVP. He is into technology, teaching and photography. He is the author of the World Famous C# Yellow Book and almost as handsome as he thinks he is.